Does ChatGPT Know More Than Your Party Wall Surveyor?

AI tools are becoming many homeowners’ first port of call when they receive a party wall notice. That’s understandable — but here’s why you should be cautious about what it tells you.

If you’ve recently received a party wall notice from a neighbour — or you’re about to serve one yourself — there’s a good chance you’ve already typed a question into ChatGPT (other AI models are available). We get it. It’s quick, it’s free, and it gives you an answer in seconds. We’re not against that. In fact, we welcome clients who arrive better informed.

But there’s a problem. Since the start of 2026, we’ve been seeing a growing number of cases where AI tools have given homeowners confidently worded — and flatly wrong — advice about party wall matters. Sometimes it’s a minor misunderstanding. Sometimes it could lead someone to make unreasonable demands, delay a project, or make decisions based on rights they simply don’t have.

Here’s what we’ve seen going wrong — and what you actually need to know.

Basic errors in reading the Act itself

The Party Wall etc. Act 1996 is not a lengthy piece of legislation, but it is precise. We’ve seen AI tools misinterpret core sections of the Act — the kind of mistakes we’d expect a trainee surveyor to stop making within a few months of starting work.

When these errors reach us as formal demands or challenges to our process, it creates confusion and can unnecessarily delay things for everyone involved — including the owner who just wants their extension built.

“Your surveyor needs to supervise the building work” — False

This is one of the most common things AI gets wrong. A party wall surveyor’s job is to protect the legal interests of both neighbours by producing a formal document called an Award (think of it as a legally binding agreement setting out how the work should be carried out). That’s where the role begins and ends.

The surveyor does not supervise the builders on site, does not check that the work is being done properly day-to-day, and is not responsible for ensuring the neighbour’s builders comply with building regulations. Those are entirely separate legal obligations — and separate professionals.

If you ask your party wall surveyor to take on a supervisory role based on what ChatGPT told you, you’re asking for something the law simply doesn’t provide for.

“You have the right to see and comment on the Award before it’s finalised” — Not quite

We’ve seen AI tell adjoining owners (that’s the neighbour affected by the work, not the one doing it) that they’re entitled to review draft documents and request changes before the Award is formally served.

This misunderstands a fundamental point about how party wall surveyors work. Once appointed, a surveyor’s duty is to act impartially — not as your personal advocate. If one side were freely able to comment on and influence the draft Award, it would compromise that impartiality entirely. The surveyors agree the content between themselves, and both parties are then served with the final document. A good surveyor will engage with you and address your concerns, (not all of which will fall within the Act’s jurisdiction) and address those that they can deal with, in the award itself so when it is served on you there are no surprises.

This isn’t the same as a normal professional relationship where you instruct someone and they report back to you. The Party Wall etc. Act 1996 creates a specific statutory framework with its own rules, and AI tools frequently flatten that nuance.

Made-up case law — a serious problem

This is perhaps the most concerning issue of all. AI systems are known to sometimes “hallucinate” — a polite way of saying they make things up and present them as fact. In party wall matters, we’ve seen this show up as misquoted legal cases and invented statements attributed to judges.

Case law is important in surveying disputes. It helps establish precedent and provides authority for certain positions. But only if it’s accurate. A misquoted or invented case doesn’t just fail to help — it can actively undermine your position.

If you’ve been given case references by an AI tool and you intend to rely on them, please ask a qualified surveyor to verify them first.

So, should you use AI at all?

We’re not saying don’t use it. AI can be helpful for getting a broad sense of what the party wall process involves, understanding unfamiliar terminology, or preparing questions to ask your surveyor. More informed clients generally lead to smoother processes.

The problem arises when AI-generated content is used as a substitute for professional advice — especially when it arrives in the form of a formal list of demands that turn out to be legally incorrect.

Party wall law is a specialist area. The Act has been tested and interpreted through case law over nearly thirty years. Getting it wrong has real consequences — delays, disputes, costs, and in some cases, damage to the relationship with the neighbour you still have to live next to.

That’s why you appoint a qualified party wall surveyor: not just to fill out paperwork, but to apply experience, judgement, and genuine legal knowledge to your specific situation — something no AI can yet reliably replicate.

Have questions about a party wall notice you’ve received, or work you’re planning?

We’re happy to have a no-obligation conversation about your situation and explain exactly what the process involves for your specific project.